How do you score on the chicken-wing-gnawing scale?

Some people eat no more than the easiest meat to get to, while others even suck out the marrow. When it comes to gnawing chicken, the differences are huge. And we mean: gigantic. But where is the line? A heated discussion has erupted on Twitter.

In my group of friends, I’m known as a chicken fanatic. I get pretty annoyed by people who don’t gnaw their chicken properly. I find it lazy. And such a waste, because chicken waste. So I simply point out their unfinished bones to my loved ones. Don’t they want to eat it themselves? Then I’ll do it for them. That chicken died to be eaten, so I’ll make sure it gets eaten too.
So the fact that a Twitter discussion recently arose about what is and isn’t acceptable on the chicken-gnawing scale makes me very happy too. It all started with this tweet:
https://twitter.com/ImpHolla/status/1202356075569307648
‘With a knife and fork’
On a good day, I score a 5, but I consider 4 the absolute minimum. Opinions in the editorial office differ wildly. Delilah: “I’m also a 4.5. I initially wanted to say 4, but then I saw a decent piece right down there, to the left beneath the top ‘joint’.” Lauretta: “3. I don’t like those tendons at the top.” Laura: “A 4. If it were fish bones, it would be higher. I eat everything off the fish.” And—ladies and gentlemen, hold on to your hats—Sharon: “A 0. I don’t gnaw. I eat it with a knife and fork (don’t laugh).” Yes, people, this is our editor-in-chief. “I just find everything about it disgusting. Stuff between your teeth. Dirty hands, lipstick everywhere. I even take chicken satay off the skewer with my fork first.” Oh well, we can’t blame her. Her father eats rusks (!!) with a knife and fork.
Twitter goes wild
Just as the discussion is unfolding here in the editorial office, it’s unfolding on Twitter too. Entire social measurement systems are being created:
5: respect
4: minimum requirement
3: is a waste
2: the wing fryer gets a free slap
1: lifetime ban from the establishment seriously don’t come back
— Jeaux (@Jeaux90060381) December 5, 2019
And harsh judgments are being handed down.
#1 people are definitely serial killers
— In Due Time (@Visionary_94) December 5, 2019
I had a date who left the wings at a 2 and we never went out again… ?
— Cyrus McQueen (@CyrusMMcQueen) December 6, 2019
For some people, it depends on where they are.
4 when I’m out, 5 when I’m home.
— Jane Honda (@enotseamynnus) December 5, 2019
For some, 3 is enough.
Since I’m eating chicken now… I’d say this is a 3 ? pic.twitter.com/dk4oSgm1eV
— Reguluh Deguluh (@TashurRaquel) December 6, 2019
For others, even 5 isn’t good enough.
6
— Isaura☀️ (@_isaura_o) December 5, 2019
I’m causing pandemonium for anyone who didn’t choose 5 pic.twitter.com/ue1ARs4jFp
— Squish ⚧? (@ShaughnW92) December 5, 2019
Look, this is how you do it:
I’m number 6 lmao i eat the bone almost. Made this gif a few years ago and I feel it fits. pic.twitter.com/LsQEugiEY1
— Gi⚡️elle ?? (@thewizgizz) December 6, 2019
Single? Now you know why:
4.
5 grosses me out. I’m sorry, don’t @ me.
If you’re a grown ass man with a 1 or a 2 you now know why you are single. ??
— Marginally Wicked Resister (@PinkyD124) December 6, 2019
You can solve it this way too:
????
Not gonna fake; I’m a straight 3. My husband is a 5. He picks up my slack.
— Database Diva (@db_diva) December 6, 2019
Naturally, I wholeheartedly agree with this.
Anyone who isn’t at least a 4.5 is wasteful and should be ashamed of themselves
— T?ᴘʜᴇʀ S?ᴜᴛʜ (@tophersouth) December 6, 2019
1-3 is disrespectful
— Mr.RED (@MrREDceo) December 5, 2019
Okay, there is one reason to choose 1:
1 is for when you bite and see pink tbf
— Tray_geee (@Tray_Gee) December 5, 2019
Want to gnaw chicken like a pro? This is how:
Also read:
- You’ll find Amsterdam’s tastiest grilled chicken here
- Chicken sashimi exists—and this is what it tastes like
- 5 tips for crispy chicken skin














