10 times we’re seriously being ripped off by packaging and advertising
Of course we don’t buy our food in anonymous paper bags. Naturally, a producer tries to make the packaging look as appealing as possible, with grandiose claims and exclamation marks. But this advertising went a little too far: this is just blatantly ripping people off. No, we’re not having it!
Of course, we’ve been amazed by packaging and what it tries to hide before. A sandwich that looks generously topped in the packaging, but when you unwrap it, all the filling is only on the side of the sandwich that you could see clearly through the packaging – it makes you furious!
We’re not having it!
And what about a large box with a tiny bag of snacks inside? Or the convenient farmer’s omelet meal pouches with egg and vegetables, which of course contain neither egg nor vegetables? No, you shouldn’t have to put up with that either.
-
- Op het eerste gezicht alle studenten blij, maar toen ze dichterbij het bord kwamen…
-
- Drie churros in een portie, maar op het plaatje staan er…
-
- In de snoepautomaat was het cijfer 1 weggevallen. Jammer, die repen waren dus 1,50 in plaats van 50 cent.
-
- Avocado-olie? Nou, niet helemaal…
-
- Mag ik die lunch van 1,99? Nee, daar staat 7,99.
-
- 99 cent. Of goedkoper. Of duurder. Dus?
-
- Grotere verpakking, minder inhoud.
-
- Kijk naar dat kleine schaaltje in de grote schaal.
-
- Als dit uit je fortune cookie komt, moet je je afvragen of je wel zo’n goed Chinees restaurant had uitgekozen.
Also read:
- Lovely and retro: these old-fashioned packages are much prettier (and a little creepy)
- 30 dishes from the past that will make you feel a little sorry for your parents
- 7 food packages that urgently need to be improved
Source: Bored Panda
